The JPhys series turned 50 this year, so we invited a selection of the best young researchers to contribute to our emerging leaders program. Read our interview with Ruggero Cortini here.
We’re asking our referees about why they do it, and how they would improve peer review.
IOPP and the scientific publishing community in general rely hugely on the peer review community and peer review is critical to the scientific process. These are the people who ensure quality and academic integrity is maintained across our journal portfolio… Read More ›
Peer Review Week 2017 has the central theme of transparancy. Find out more about our appeals procedure here.
Is there really any difference between peer reviewing papers for a conference or for a journal? It depends on whom you are talking to. The Editors of a journal will tell you to put the utmost care and effort into… Read More ›
Take a look at our animated tour of the peer review process at IOP Publishing.
Here at IOP Publishing it’s been a busy year since the last Peer Review Week!
Could close proximity electrostatic effect in small clusters of emitters be used to design nanometric oscillators?
Effects of non-coplanar spin texture and spin scalar chirality
Could ultrashort circularly polarized light pulses be the key for next-generation spintronic devices?
Can we measure the magnetic signature of a state without altering that state?
Last week saw the release of the 2016 Journal Impact Factors from Thompson Reuters, with strong performances across the JPhys series.
Read our series of viewpoints highlighting revolutionary research from the first 50 years of JPhys
Recent research reveals that previously unknown relativistic physics could be at the heart of femtosecond coherent magnetism.
This weeks image come from a Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter Special Issue on oxide interfaces
How can this be studied through the nonlinear magnetization dynamics of coupled ferromagnetic nanowires?