We’re asking our referees about why they do it, and how they would improve peer review.
Peer review week
IOPP and the scientific publishing community in general rely hugely on the peer review community and peer review is critical to the scientific process. These are the people who ensure quality and academic integrity is maintained across our journal portfolio… Read More ›
Peer Review Week 2017 has the central theme of transparancy. Find out more about our appeals procedure here.
Is there really any difference between peer reviewing papers for a conference or for a journal? It depends on whom you are talking to. The Editors of a journal will tell you to put the utmost care and effort into… Read More ›
Take a look at our animated tour of the peer review process at IOP Publishing.
Here at IOP Publishing it’s been a busy year since the last Peer Review Week!
Find out what our journals will be up to in 2017.
We look back at the articles which were most popular with our readers in the last 12 months.
Integral to any of the form of peer review is the reviewers themselves. As part of Peer Review Week, John Inglesfield, a JPCM Board Member and experienced reviewer answered our questions about peer review from a referee’s point of view.
Peer Review Week 2016: An Editorial Assistant’s story. A tale of love, betrayal and copyright forms.
You’ve heard what our Editors do, now hear from Lucy Joy about what role our Editorial Assistants play in peer review.
As part of Peer Review Week find out from our Editors what really happens between submission and publication of a paper.
The total number of referee reports received by the JPhys series during Peer Review Week 2016 so far!
As part of Peer Review Week 2016, the JPhys team and IOP Publishing are exploring how peer review works and looking at what we do to #RecognizeReview