The norms in scientific publishing are evolving and publishers are taking note. IOP’s new journal embraces open access and objective peer review assessment to address the needs of today’s researchers.
Peer review
Peer Review Week 2017: what do our referees think?
We’re asking our referees about why they do it, and how they would improve peer review.
A year’s snapshot of Peer Review
IOPP and the scientific publishing community in general rely hugely on the peer review community and peer review is critical to the scientific process. These are the people who ensure quality and academic integrity is maintained across our journal portfolio… Read More ›
Peer Review Week 2017 – Shining a light on our appeals procedure
Peer Review Week 2017 has the central theme of transparancy. Find out more about our appeals procedure here.
Peer Review for Conference Proceedings versus Journals: is there a difference?
Is there really any difference between peer reviewing papers for a conference or for a journal? It depends on whom you are talking to. The Editors of a journal will tell you to put the utmost care and effort into… Read More ›
Video: The Journey of a Paper
Take a look at our animated tour of the peer review process at IOP Publishing.
Peer Review Week: updates since 2016!
Here at IOP Publishing it’s been a busy year since the last Peer Review Week!
Focus on peer review: Dr Christian Beck is JPhysG’s Reviewer of the Year
Here at IOP Publishing we are proud to recognize the invaluable service that our reviewers provide the scientific community. To celebrate their contribution, last year we awarded 1391 Outstanding Reviewer awards, and 39 Reviewer of the Year awards across our journals. Here, we interview Dr Christian Beck of Universite de Strasbourg, France, 2016 Reviewer of the Year for Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
Focus on Peer-review: With JPhysA Reviewer of the Year – Jukka Kiukas
Here at IOP Publishing we are proud to recognize the invaluable service that our reviewers provide the scientific community. To celebrate their contribution, last year we awarded 1391 Outstanding Reviewer awards, and 39 Reviewer of the Year awards across our… Read More ›
Focus on Peer-review: Reviewer of the year Daniel Errandonea
Recognizing excellence in reviewing
Top 5 Most Read in 2016
We look back at the articles which were most popular with our readers in the last 12 months.
Peer Review Week 2016: It’s all about the reviewers
Integral to any of the form of peer review is the reviewers themselves. As part of Peer Review Week, John Inglesfield, a JPCM Board Member and experienced reviewer answered our questions about peer review from a referee’s point of view.
Peer Review Week 2016: An Editorial Assistant’s story. A tale of love, betrayal and copyright forms.
You’ve heard what our Editors do, now hear from Lucy Joy about what role our Editorial Assistants play in peer review.
Peer Review Week 2016: The life of a research paper
As part of Peer Review Week find out from our Editors what really happens between submission and publication of a paper.
Peer Review Week 2016: How many referee reports have we received today?
The total number of referee reports received by the JPhys series during Peer Review Week 2016 so far!
Peer Review Week 2016: What is peer review?
As part of Peer Review Week 2016, the JPhys team and IOP Publishing are exploring how peer review works and looking at what we do to #RecognizeReview
JPhys+ 